Website development services that rank as well as they look

Defined projects get a fixed price after discovery; open-ended work runs on a day rate. Unique templates, languages, integrations and content migration move the number. Licences, hosting and stock assets are billed at cost, never marked up. Your figure comes with the free audit.

Counted from a signed scope, not your first enquiry: a focused marketing site takes weeks, a larger multi-language build a couple of months, a store migration longer. Late content and slow approvals cause most delays. Fixed deadline? We phase the launch.

Design decides how the site looks and how the journey works. Development turns that into maintainable code with a CMS behind it — the service on this page. We start from Figma files or an existing brand system and review them before quoting.

Yes. Code, content, hosting and analytics accounts transfer to you, written into the contract. No proprietary CMS, no licence held hostage: plugin licences are registered in your name. You could move to another developer without a rebuild.

It can, and the cause is rarely the design — it is unmapped URLs and lost internal links. The safeguard is a URL inventory, a one-to-one 301 map, a staged launch, then a ranking check. Fluctuation after a big migration is normal; a permanent drop is not.

Yes. We work in English across international time zones and invoice with reverse charge where it applies. Meetings run by video call, with one written update a week. GDPR is handled directly and a data processing agreement is available.

Every build includes a post-launch window covering defects: anything not working as scoped is fixed as part of the project. New requests are quoted separately, and we say which is which before starting. A retainer afterwards is optional, never a condition of the site staying up.

Yes, often the cleanest way to run a project. For a clean handover we need components rather than flat screens, interaction states, responsive breakpoints and fonts with licences. Where the design has gaps, we flag and quote them.

Web Push's website development services cover six build types: marketing and corporate sites with templates your team publishes to, multi-language sites, content and comparison sites with taxonomies and filtered listings, e-commerce with faceted navigation and EU tax rules, custom front-ends on a WordPress back end, and redesigns of a site you have outgrown. Brand identity work and native mobile apps sit outside the service.

A multi-language build from Web Push means correct hreflang, one URL per language, and an editing flow translators can use. Platform follows the scope rather than being sold before it, settled by who edits day to day, catalogue size, the integrations required, peak traffic and what your team can maintain once Web Push has gone. The build standards hold regardless: semantic markup, one h1 per page, Core Web Vitals green on mobile at launch.

Discovery comes first: Web Push interviews whoever owns the site, maps pages and integrations, and returns a fixed-price scope — week zero of the project. The intro call runs about thirty minutes, mostly questions. Useful input is the current URL, what is going wrong, a target launch date and a budget band. A written discovery document with scope, sitemap and information architecture follows, with the quote in writing within days.

After a signed scope, weeks one to two produce key templates as working pages rather than flat mockups, approved on a real phone. Weeks two to eight cover templates, CMS fields, integrations and content migration on staging, with one written update a week on the same day. Launch week is checklist QA, redirect testing, go-live and recorded CMS training. The senior who scoped the project builds it.

Web Push publishes no website development figures, because a number without a scope is a guess. The price arrives with the free audit instead — in writing, with the assumptions it rests on listed — after the URL you send has been reviewed. Good-fit projects name a budget band before scoping. When a project is too vague to quote, a paid discovery is run and comes off the build if you proceed.

No — Web Push states on the first call that it is not the cheapest quote, that it will not drop your logo into a template, and that it does not build native mobile apps. The commitments it does make are senior developers only on billable work, a fixed scope quoted after discovery rather than guessed on a call, Core Web Vitals green on mobile at launch, WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility checks, and code, content and accounts handed over in full.

Web Push is a boutique, senior-only team rather than a production line: the senior who scopes a project writes the code and answers the emails, with no account manager relaying questions. Compared with an in-house hire, it suits teams that own their content but have no developer to own code, CMS and releases. The client roster is deliberately small, and work outside its competence is declined.